How to Read the Bible for All Its Worth
Fee, Gordon D. and Douglas
Stuart. How to
Read the Bible for All Its Worth (2nd Edition). Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1993. ISBN 0-310-38491-5. 265 pages.
There are certain hazards in reviewing a book that has
become somewhat of a standard, especially amongst evangelical and many
charismatic Bible students. But I
believe this review will be useful to those who are trying to select a book to
guide them in Bible study, and also to those who may have tried this book and
found that not all their questions were answered.
This book is neither a scholarly introduction to Biblical
exegesis, nor is it a simple, layman’s guide to Bible study for those with
limited time and effort. It will thus
tend to dissatisfy many readers. It is a
guide for the serious layman or the more casual student, for example, the
Sunday School teacher or the church leader whose specialty is other than
Biblical studies. In that area, it is a
very good guide. I do have some
reservations, however, which I will list below.
But first let me note that both authors have written
introductory books at the scholarly level in their respective fields, (Fee’s “New
Testament Exegesis” and Stuart’s “Old
Testament Exegesis”) and so the need for a slightly more intense
introduction to each area has been filled.
First, the strong points.
The authors cover basics of interpretation quite thoroughly,
starting with the basic need for interpretation (chapter 1). They divide the process of interpretation
into two parts, exegesis and hermeneutics.
These two terms often overlap in general usage, but Stuart and Fee are
using them as getting at the meaning in historical context and applying that
meaning to a contemporary situation respectively. They base their approach to exegesis on a
rather realistic understanding of what the Bible is, noting the differences in
authorship and historical or cultural situation, and nonetheless affirming a
high view of scripture. Those who are
acquainted with these authors will not be surprised, but the combination of the
high view of scripture and understanding the historical and cultural
circumstances is often missed by those outside the community of scholarship.
The authors deal well with issues of context, and history,
as well as the process of interpretation including application quite effectively. I think they draw the boundary lines a bit
firmly, but since most people will probably color outside the lines more than
they should, perhaps this is a good restriction! I do think that their resource
recommendations (p. 23) should include material from a broader range of
perspectives. To material from Zondervan
(Pictorial
Encyclopedia of the Bible) and Eerdmans (International
Standard Bible Encyclopedia) I would certainly add items such as the
HarperCollins Bible
Commentary and Bible
Dictionary, the Oxford
Companion to the Bible, and study Bibles such as the Oxford
Study Bible [see my
review] or New
Oxford Annotated Bible. In turn I
recommend that those who are more liberal in persuasion include the
recommendations of these authors.
The second chapter on Bible translations is excellent. I would note, however, that I think the
authors are a bit too hard on the New World Translation—though I don’t like it
and I think it has many flaws, it’s not quite as bad as they suggest. Otherwise for a book not dedicated to Bible
translations, this material is excellent.
They follow these two chapters with several chapters on specific
sections of the Bible or types of literature.
I think this approach is excellent.
The chapters are:
The Epistles:
Learning to Think Contextually
The Epistles: The
Hermeneutical Questions
The Old Testament Narratives: Their Proper Use
Acts: The Question of
Historical Precedent
The Gospels: One
Story, Many Dimensions
The Parables: Do You
Get the Point
The Law(s): Covenant
Stipulations for Israel
The Prophets:
Enforcing the Covenant in Israel
The Psalms: Israel’s
Prayers and Ours
Wisdom: Then and Now
The Revelations:
Images of Judgment and Hope
Unfortunately, the very nature of the subject matter makes
it difficult to write a neutral guide which would merely show people methods of
finding the meaning for themselves. For
example, the chapter on Old Testament narratives is subtitled “Their Proper
Use.” There are certain assumptions
about the reason that narratives are included in scripture in the specific
guidelines given for use of Old Testament narratives. This is necessary, simply in order to discuss
them at all, but it still tends to involve a set of rules derived from one’s
view of scripture rather than an open approach that will allow one to examine
various possibilities. I would
particularly consider the restrictions on the use of narrative to be a bit
excessive. I could make a similar
comment on the parables, though the vast majority of the material is right on
target and corrects major misuses, it also appears to put a very narrow box
around the interpretation of Biblical parallels.
In the appendix we again have recommendations of
commentaries, and these are very strongly slated to evangelical
commentaries. While I would recommend
strongly that these commentaries be taken seriously, and would urge my more
liberal readers to include volumes from the New International Commentary on the
Old Testament (example: Numbers),
New International Commentary on the New Testament (example: 1
Corinthians [see my
review]), Apollos Old Testament Commentary (example: Deuteronomy)
and Tyndale Old Testament Commentary (example:
Genesis),
I would also suggest the Anchor Bible series (example: Malachi),
the Old Testament Library (example: Isaiah),
the International Critical Commentary (example:
2
Corinthians) and the Hermeneia (example:
Daniel)
series.
These commentary recommendations lead me to what I think is a
serious lack in this and other books on basic Bible study for Christians: A study of critical methodologies. Some may wonder whether such a study is
important in basic materials. I think it
is. With materials such as Jesus Seminar
publications and various books on authorship of the Bible available in secular
book stores, Christians will be exposed to such material at some time or
another, and they need to know at least some of the basics of the process by
which historical-critical conclusions are derived. I don’t know of any good basic guide that can
be recommended to the layman.